Rhetorical Analysis: “What is DACA? And How Did It End Up in the Supreme Court?” by Caitlin Dickerson

The New York Times article “What is DACA? And How Did It End Up in the Supreme Court?” written by Caitlin Dickerson explains the DACA program and gives the readers an update of its stance in the Supreme Court. Dickerson is a “national immigration reporter based in New York State” whose work has received a Peabody Award and a Murrow Award. Since she is based in New York State, which has a high immigrant population, and primarily focuses on immigration and immigrants, it is clear that Dickerson is more than qualified to write this article, though she does lean in favour of the immigrants. In this article, Dickerson highlights the DACA Program, gives a brief overview of how it was created in 2012 by President Obama, and how it is now trying to be dismantled by President Trump. Seeing as the majority of this article was dedicated to explaining what DACA is, who it benefits and how it benefits its recipients shows how this article was aimed at people who are not yet familiar with this program. Dickerson carefully crafts her writing to make sure that she doesn’t use highly opinionated words or stark phrases that may offend people who may already have opinions on the DACA program. Instead, as a news article, she takes a more neutral stance, focusing solely on the facts of the situation by linking other articles and demographics to inform her audience. She chose to include demographics that had a favourable light towards immigrants and even made sure to mention how “Contrary to what President Trump has said, people with serious criminal histories (meaning a felony or serious misdemeanour conviction, or three convictions for any type of misdemeanour) are not eligible” for the program. Though Dickerson doesn’t use much pathos in her writing, the videos that she chose to include, especially “What ‘Dreamers’ Gained From DACA” By A.j. Chavar, which showcases the lives of DACA immigrants and their struggles, makes her sympathy clear. The point of all of these positive demographics and the sympathetical videos goes to show how Dickerson wants to imply that these immigrants are simply trying to better their lives in America.

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/article/what-is-daca.html

Comments ( 3 )

  1. Edward Quezada
    After reading through your analysis, I think it is great that the author chose to provide an informative article on DACA so others who are unfamiliar with the matter can learn more about it. I agree with how she crafted this article by maintaining a neutral stance and focusing on the factual stance of the program.
  2. Andrew Mark Salmieri
    I always enjoy new articles that lay out the basics of an issue or topic so that it is more easily digested by readers. This DACA article was excellent in doing that. Thank you for sharing this. I personally have friends that I care for very much that are Dreamers, and being informed on this topic means a lot to me. Also, the neutral tone and facts about the program were very apparent throughout the peace, making it more informational than opinionated. I have my own political views, but I realize that we must always read the facts before formulating our own opinions. We cannot exist in an echo chamber where only our view is present, we must allow our ideas to be debated and challenged. Thank you for sharing this.
  3. Andrew Mark Salmieri
    news* not new (line 1) piece* not peace (line 5)

Skip to toolbar